Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louis-Pierre Dillais

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There is no clear consensus after being re-listed twice. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 21:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Louis-Pierre Dillais[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP1E. Known only for being involved in the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior, and all content is about this. Should be covered there, if at all. Sandstein 20:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - lots of source spread across multiple countries, decades and languages. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But this does not address the problem that the sources are all about one event, the Rainbow Warrior sinking, which should lead us to cover this person in the context of that article. Sandstein 08:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP1E has three required conditions, only the first is met. Publishing an account in The Times about the event is not maintaining a low profile. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems to have enough to meet notability NealeFamily (talk) 04:26, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as still questionable for his own solid notability. SwisterTwister talk 23:59, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:22, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.