Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Teke Teke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 05:01, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Los Teke Teke[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unable to establish this as Wikipedia-notable/deserving of an article Osplace 20:27, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:NMUSIC, WP:BAND, and WP:GNG. Qworty (talk) 20:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Delete~~Weak delete Agree with Qworty. It is a mess. No evidence of notability. No WP:RS. I have no idea what the author intends. This was subject to WP:PROD and the putative "author" did nothing to improve the article. Even if they did, this is not remotely encyclopedic, notable, or comprehensible. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 20:30, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Based on comments hereafter, there is some coverage. Of course, none of it is in this article yet. The article is an advertisement and promo, and is still a mess. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 00:52, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have no idea if it's notable or not, but if the tentative consensus above changes and the article gets kept, it needs to be completely rewritten. It's almost incomprehensible as it is. LadyofShalott 20:40, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article is an advert for a non-notable musical product. A search on Google yields lots of YouTube, file-sharing and MP3 links. I did not find newspaper or magazine links.--Toddy1 (talk) 21:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 20:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. LadyofShalott 20:48, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete: Wikipedia is not MySpace, which is the usual venue for promotional content such as this. While the usual response to that is WP:SOFIXIT, my understanding of the Spanish language is insufficient to work with the sources I have found on the web, let alone comment on the notability of this ensemble. I will say, however, there does appear to be some coverage out there. Whether it's significant or reliable, I do not know. [1], [2]. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 21:29, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - No significant coverage, available sources insufficient to meet WP:BAND and WP:NMUSIC. Perhaps the sources posted by Mendaliv may help, but if they don't, delete. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 05:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: created by a block-evading alternate account, no substantial contributions by anyone else, so it's technically covered by WP:CSD#G5. Amalthea 17:01, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think generally when we're at AfD already, G5 is precluded. But the fact that an indeffed user created the article while circumventing his block is persuasive. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 01:35, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A quick search on Allmusic didn't bring up any results nor any charts from Billboard. Erick (talk) 05:11, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.