Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lorong 1 Geylang Bus Terminal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:56, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lorong 1 Geylang Bus Terminal[edit]

Lorong 1 Geylang Bus Terminal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable bus terminal, Fails GNG, –Davey2010Talk 00:29, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:04, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 07:04, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:GNG, WP:NOTTRAVEL.Charles (talk) 09:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Concur with above, not notable. MB 05:12, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge into one larger article. I am not sure why are so many transport stop articles are being deleted. There is enough information including a photo, coordinates, opening date. This information is historically significant and Wikipedia should try to preserve this. If separate small articles are not possible, I will myself take out time and create one larger article which has all the information. But I am quite disappointed that so much information is being deleted.--DreamLinker (talk) 05:41, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I already merged the content into List of bus stations in Singapore so that we can at least have one article which contains the information.--DreamLinker (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.