Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loretta Claiborne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Synergy 11:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Loretta Claiborne[edit]

It has no sources and I feel it is not notable. Plus the page just looks ugly. IT ALSO HAS MULTIPLE EXCLAMATION POINTS IN IT! How am I the first person to notice this?

DELETE KingsOfHearts (talk) 07:33, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the version of the article KingsOfHearts refers to. I've tidied it up slightly, and there appear to be a fair few hits in Google News, but the article makes some pretty large claims without providing WP:reliable sources (some of which might be a WP:BLP concern). No stance. -- saberwyn 07:41, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if the article can be appropriately sourced. Looking ugly isn't yet a reason to delete a page and multiple exclamation points can be removed. Movingboxes (talk) 08:15, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per Movingboxes. Asenine 14:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep and improve the article. --Ixfd64 (talk) 20:17, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article was cleaned up a bit befor I got there, and I have begun to add sources. There are a lot of reliable sources out for this, and the woman was the subject of a TV movie made by Disney. News coverage abounds, and she was the first SO athlete ever elected to the Board of Directors of Special Olympics International. Notability is far from being an issue. Jim Miller ^{See me | Touch me | Review me} 21:26, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.