Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LordTrox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:00, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

LordTrox[edit]

I came across this while sorting stubs for Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Middle Ages task force. It reads like an advertisement, has no references, no Wikilinks, and hasn't improved since November. No assertion of notability either - so it might qualify for a speedy as a vanity entry. I'll list it here since I'm not sure role-playing games can be speedied. Durova 02:09, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nn. Seems to be a mislabeled article on some RPG that I can't even find anywhere. Fan1967 02:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete. Patent nonsense, vanity, nn-club. Is it an ad for some kind of RPG? I don't know. Kiss it goodbye Deizio 02:31, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like an ad for somebody's home-grown MUD. Durova 02:42, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- Goodness me. How has this survived for so long? Reyk 02:40, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - idiotic Nobunaga24 02:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per deizio ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 03:22, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. At best it's an advert for a non-notable RPG. PJM 03:33, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - copy-and-paste job from the non-notable Medieval Times MUD page, which was hosted at Lord Trox.com (now redirects to Times Mud.com). Green Giant 04:27, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Get medieval on this article and delete it. --E lkman - ^(talk) 04:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete per all Bucketsofg 04:33, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, utter WP:VSCA garbage. --Kinu ^t/_c 06:21, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above --Khoikhoi 06:32, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the reasons given above. ProhibitOnions 11:52, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete. Non-notable, vanity, advertisement, and copyvio, considering it's a cut and paste job. Jud e (talk,contribs,email) 00:22, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete How could something this stupid survive so long. Didn't anyone see it sooner? Tobyk777 05:50, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.