Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LoopFuse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. This could have been speedied, or prodded. -Splash - tk 23:26, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LoopFuse[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obscure marketing company. Ranked lower (at #20) than the equally obscure Officeautopilot in a market survey. Tijfo098 (talk) 08:28, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Appears to be a self-published ad for the company. Not notable. No real references. LogicalCreator (talk) 08:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep Did you do WP:BEFORE or just base your decision on that market survey you quote? I'm seeing some Google News results.[1][2][3][4][5] [6][7][8] --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:15, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Out of those only the IDG new story (reproduced in PC World, Infoworld etc.) is significant independent coverage. You obviously know next-to-nothing about start-ups if you think CrunchBase is an independent source. And Atlanta Business Chronicle is too local/obscure to impart much notability. Tijfo098 (talk) 10:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:58, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 12:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not Notable. Article was created by user with no prior edits, and his/her only six(6) edits have been designed to promote this company and nothing else.OfficeGirl (talk) 19:34, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- comment.Should also consider speedy delete under G11. OfficeGirl (talk) 19:50, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.