Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Look (company)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:51, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Look (company)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Look (company) No secondary sources, marginal claim (its a bike parts company) to significance, can't find WP:RS to establish notability using google, article is still largely promotional. SWL36 (talk) 15:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SWL36 (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. SWL36 (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cycling-related deletion discussions. SWL36 (talk) 15:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I do not see the text as promotional. It describes the products, claims their innovation and claims they are used by olympic teams. In other words, this is factual verifiable information. The only problem is lack of independent sources in this article, but they do exist in French language, such as [1]. Also not without recognition: dont le très envié « PME la plus innovante de France ", obtenu en 2009 Staszek Lem (talk) 17:20, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to include the French sources, they will be required if you want to prove the company is notable per WP:GNG; ~~another editor~~ already deleted the promotional "sponsorship" section where the information was not in the reference provided. SWL36 (talk) 17:28, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, you were the one who removed that section. The sources you've linked are a good start but to save this article the unreferenced info will have to be pruned and replaced with the new references and then be weighed for notability. SWL36 (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:10, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This reference from lesechos.fr fails WP:ORGIND since it is not intellectually independent and relies on information provided by the CEO. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As it stands, I have been unable to find any references that are intellectually independent that provide in-depth information on the company, references fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Perhaps references exist in French and if they can be found I'll happily change my !vote but as it currently stands, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:54, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above comment. Redditaddict6 9 08:25, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 09:18, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.