Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longbowmen of Geoff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Geoff (Greyhawk)#Military Organizations . (non-admin closure)Davey2010Talk 00:06, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Longbowmen of Geoff[edit]

Longbowmen of Geoff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails to establish notability. TTN (talk) 23:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 23:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable "organization". Meatsgains (talk) 00:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - what of the hell? Bearian (talk) 01:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or merge to Geoff (Greyhawk). BOZ (talk) 04:15, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Extremely minor fictional organization that has very little importance, even within the fictional Greyhawk universe. Unlike the various other D&D related articles that have come up on AFD, this one barely even has any primary sources, let alone any third party sources. One, single article mentioning them (which is the only thing that even exists on the topic, as far as I can find) means that the information on the group is not worth even merging anywhere. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 20:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge/redirect to Geoff (Greyhawk); it's not like the title is needed for anything else. That said, the target article may well have to go in the long run. Josh Milburn (talk) 01:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Geoff (Greyhawk)#Military Organizations per J Milburn. Jclemens (talk) 19:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Non-notable fictional organization. -- Dane talk 19:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.