Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Real TV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. I would also note that the article was put on AFD less than an hour after creation which is considered to be bad form. Stifle (talk) 15:42, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

London Real TV[edit]

London Real TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of significance Itsalleasy (talk) 19:26, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - AfD - London Real TV-

Not sure why there's an AfD happening on the article I've just made. Considering it's my first article in Wikipidea, would anyone help me navigate me through this and lessen the chances it would be deleted? help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theamotimes (talkcontribs) 21:16, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the user nominated the article because all of the references are mostly YouTube with no significant links such as news articles. I performed a couple of quick searches in hopes to find something but didn't so I don't know if this show has received much news attention without digging further. SwisterTwister talk 04:32, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 12:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 23:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.