Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Ishq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete without redirecting, as that would clearly violate WP:V Beeblebrox (talk) 23:15, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

London Ishq[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article has no sources other than Facebook and Youtube. There already exists a well sourced article on the film: Yash Chopra's Untitled Project. Also, much of the text of that one is copied to this one. BollyJeff || talk 12:59, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Yash Chopra's Untitled Project. I'm not sure which title it should come under, but one article is superfluous. London Ishq is the less developed article, but is that the actual film title? --Colapeninsula (talk) 13:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's the problem. There is no reliable source for the title. On the film's official site from the filmmaker it is listed as untitled, and it is likely to remain so for some time. Enthusiastic editors keep coming in and naming it without sources; first Jai, and Now London Ishq. When they get reverted, they create a new article with the title of their choice. BollyJeff || talk 14:12, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess you could merge with Yash Chopra then. --Colapeninsula (talk) 15:55, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing to merge, he is copying text from one article to another. The proper thing to do is stick with Yash Chopra's Untitled Project until an official title is given, and then move it to a new name. Almost everything this editor has done in the past has been deleted. Take a look at User talk:Iamnabi. Can't they be stopped for disruptive editing? BollyJeff || talk 17:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and create redirect to Yash Chopra's Untitled Project (if there is anything to merge, do so, the rest can go). --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 10:24, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect the other page to this Makes sense to redirect Yash Chopra's Untitled Project to here — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.195.135.81 (talk) 11:22, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn't. london-ishq-is-not-the-title-of-the-film BollyJeff || talk 21:05, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect London Ishq to Yash Chopra's Untitled Project - London Ishq is not the name of the film, officially. Secondly, the article is a total mess and reads like a magazine run by some fans. Seriously? "Its great to have you back in the director's chair Yashji" has no place on Wikipedia. ~*~Ankit Bhatt~*~ 06:30, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:A10. This duplicates an existing article. And with respects to those above, and in agreement with the nominator, I do not see a redirect from a verifiable as incorrect title as worth consideration. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:21, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.