Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Film Location Guide
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 03:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
London Film Location Guide[edit]
- London Film Location Guide (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I see nothing particularly notable about this book, and can't find the slightest coverage other than a couple of reviews, which demonstrate that it exists but not a great deal else. – iridescent 16:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The book itself is non-notable although its information is probably of interest. Eddie.willers (talk) 23:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —PC78 (talk) 18:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Article has been expanded and sourced. It has received favorable reviews. If I'm ever in London, I want this book in hand. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:19, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- the article is a bit thin; and fails to say anything particularly substantive. Unless someone mounts a rescue effort, then delete. Kbthompson (talk) 08:35, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did a bit more expansion and sourcing of the book detailing 750 locations for notable films shot in London. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:28, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Notable. Could always be merged if author or series of guides exist as target. ChildofMidnight (talk) 01:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and clean-up as needed. Sources presented are reviews one would expect for a book like this, seems sufficient to build from. More sources would be better of course. -- Banjeboi 22:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomination. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 05:36, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.