Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London City F.C
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW (Talk) 01:27, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
London City F.C[edit]
- London City F.C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Hoax. There is no such team in the Conference South, or indeed in any other notable football league. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sunday league team [1]. Nanonic (talk) 17:41, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That doesn't seem to be the club described in this article, as the names of the chairman and manager don't match, the badge is different, and the website says that that London City has been active for over 8 years. I think this article is just an out-and-out hoax -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. – PeeJay 17:43, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, non-notable team. GiantSnowman 17:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is a non-notable team/hoax. Not only that, the article creator has amended, (badly), Conference South so as to shoehorn in this team--Egghead06 (talk) 17:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - a non-notable team that is becoming a hoax Spiderone 18:45, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - There may be a team called London City, but this isn't that one. (They also can't be in the Conference South having been formed last year - it simply isn't possible. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 19:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete: Ridiculously blatant hoax. -- BigDom 10:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete hoax. Oh, and I'm not just saying this because of the policy. It is SNOWING!!! :D WFCforLife (talk) 23:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Really really speedy delete. This was created by a guy with a history of introducing rubbish into Wikipedia. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The One & Only Fools and Horses 19:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.