Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/London Buses route 110

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:55, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

London Buses route 110[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this article is significant enough for a place on Wikipedia. I understand that it may be of interest of importance to some, but there is little content. There is some data on this in the List of Bus Routes in London page, and this should be enough. Quoll662 (talk) 11:38, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~KEEP: meets the NCTEST The Ace in Spades (talk) 12:31, 15 December 2020 (UTC)~~ — The Ace in Spades (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Waskerton (talk • contribs). [reply]

Could you elaborate on the "NCTEST"? SK2242 (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete So far all I can find is Richmond & Twickenham Times in terms of significant coverage. SK2242 (talk) 12:36, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.