Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolicore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lourdes 16:33, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lolicore[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. No significant coverage from reliable sources. Appears to be a neologism. — Newslinger talk 10:33, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 10:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 10:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — Newslinger talk 10:35, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Only sources are primary. Doesn't seem to be a mainstream genre. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 20:42, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete No references, looks like 100% original research. One of the external links is an open directory hosting pirated doujin albums. RoseCherry64 (talk) 22:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Verification and sourcing issues aside, using Wikipedia to increase usage of a neologism is a clear violation of policy (WP:NOTNEO). Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so this article should not be in Wikipedia. Bakazaka (talk) 21:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.