Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lolfoundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:A7. So Why 09:55, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lolfoundation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A noble cause, but I fail to see them satisfying WP:NGO, after I conducted a before search. The article no doubt is an WP:ADMASQ trying to draw awareness to their services. No in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources could be observed & this is so bad, I thought for a while that the article might have been made up had I not narrowed my search parameters. Celestina007 (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 23:03, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per WP:A7. No independent sourcing. Best, GPL93 (talk) 02:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.