Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lola Destiny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:48, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lola Destiny[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an article about an actress who is not yet an actress and who will play in a show that doesn't exist yet. The article has been created by an user with the same name. Maimai009 18:03, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Acather96 (talk) 18:51, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- Acather96 (talk) 18:52, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Being an upcoming actress, appearing in upcoming productions and writing songs that may be produced someday is not a criteria for notability. See WP:CBALL. --Crunch (talk) 19:02, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Come back when we've had a chance to see how significant this programme is and how significant her role in the show is. (Note: it is rare for an actor to be deemed notable on the back of one production. Probably a long way to go before she's anywhere near notable.) Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 19:14, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet notability guidelines WP:GNG WP:ACTOR, no reliable sources Chzz ► 14:18, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.