Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lok Tiwari

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♠ 05:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lok Tiwari[edit]

Lok Tiwari (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As explained on Talk:Lok Tiwari in more detail, I could not find one useable sources from the {{Find sources}} links for news, newspapers, HighBeam, JSTOR, scholar, and the WP reference custom search. From a general web search, there are a lot of social media, blog, Q&A interviews (that appear to be duplicated in other sources), and sources that are not meeting the reliable, secondary or independent sources guidelines. I am not finding enough to prove notability per WP:GNG, and believe this is likely a case of WP:TOOSOON. —CaroleHenson(talk) 11:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:02, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • He is renown social worker and businessman among Nepalese in the USA. I am improving this article. User:HariKrishna123
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Some sources are ok to prove his notability but not enough. Need to improve but not to delete. User:Kingnewyork 18:20, 13 January 2017 (EST)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | Talk 00:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note:From this, it seems the page creator may have a conflict of interest. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.