Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan International Airport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy close . This belongs at RfD. Debate has been copied there. KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:54, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan International Airport[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article for Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport already exists; there is no airport by the name of the article nominated for deletion (it was simply created by a user who has created other variants of the same Jasepl (talk) 16:03, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems this is a redirect issue. From what to what, I'm not positive. Probably from this to Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Airport. --Oakshade (talk) 20:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its more than that.

There is already an article called "Lok Nayak Jayaprakash Narayan Airport" - this is valid.

One user, in an attempt to make the airport looker more important (in his mind anyway) created two additional articles:

And then filled said pages with either the same exact content as in the valid article, or added random bits of unneeded (or incorrect) information.

Someone else then removed the content and added a redirect.

Basically, neither of the new articles should exist, because there's not even a need for a redirect. The airport is not an international one, so the user's adding that word in a new article's title was false.

Jasepl (talk) 04:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiff 18:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.