Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logitech Racing Wheels compatibility

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 04:02, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Logitech Racing Wheels compatibility[edit]

WP:V - no sources. It's a list of unsourced material and there's no way to verify the info. John Nagle (talk) 04:15, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete if it can't be sourced. JIP | Talk 07:16, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Vote retracted because the article now has sources. JIP | Talk 04:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If there isn't any sources then it has got to go. --Vhoscythe^chatter 14:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'll take back my vote because sources were found.
Delete - will never be secondary sources for this --T-rex 15:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep as a relatively simple search turned up verification with a primary source, but also reliable secondary sources (such as "Logitech Announces Compatibility for Several Racing Wheels & Gran Turismo HD" and "Logitech Unveils Official Wheel of Gran Turismo for PLAYSTATION 3" among others) that discuss the compatability in some detail. I have begun revising the article accordingly. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 20:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Press releases are not secondary sources, even if slightly rewritten --T-rex 18:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Reviews of the device that also touch upon compatibility, however, are secondary sources. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 19:08, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep per above. -Rushyo (talk) 01:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles' findings; however, needs cleanup. MuZemike (talk) 03:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, verifiability and notability are now established, but rework it beyond the current list format. Everyking (talk) 04:01, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as sourced. Cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:30, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.