Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logistics Bureau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. pure advertising DGG ( talk ) 17:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Logistics Bureau[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP. The company has received some routine coverage in specialist publications e.g. [1] , but nothing substantial in mainstream sources. (Clean up of paid editing). SmartSE (talk) 15:35, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as although I found some links at Books, browser and Highbeam, there's nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 07:07, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:12, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.