Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logiks (framework)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:47, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Logiks (framework)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, promotional article about non-notable software created by a WP:COI editor. Recreated after a previous speedy deletion. I was unable to find any reliable sources with which to establish notability per WP:GNG. - Mr X 02:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 06:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article containing multiple peacock terms, contributed by a WP:SPA account. Multiple searches are turning up no evidence of attained notability. AllyD (talk) 06:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage of this software.Dialectric (talk) 10:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:17, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above. "we intend to manage wikipedia's Logiks page" makes me unlikely to give any sort of benefit of the doubt. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:B2B. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 11:41, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.