Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Logan Gilpin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:04, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Logan Gilpin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. The article asserts that a film won an award, but I cannot find any reliable source for this. See [1] and [2]. Clubmarx (talk) 01:20, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 18:19, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Clubmarx (talk) 02:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Biography-related deletion discussions. —Clubmarx (talk) 02:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Clubmarx (talk) 02:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as simply too soon. I've prettied the autobio up some, but the filmmaker's career fails WP:ENT... and coverage of the fellow fails WP:GNG. While his receiving a Telly Award is a consideration, I have as of yet been unable to nail it down in a decent source. Failing ENT, GNG, and ANYBIO, my opinion is a deletion... without prejudice toward recreation once this fellow gets more going on. Sorry Logan. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:53, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per reasons given by Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.}. Rudybowwow (talk) 06:10, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.