Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lodsworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. (aeropagitica) 13:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lodsworth[edit]

Non-notable village, page aparently created to advertise a pub. First edit by author BrownHairedGirl 15:11, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ I added a link to the village council's website and a {{Sussex-geo-stub}} but I don't think that there is enough of note about the place to make it worthy of an article. The pub doesn't appear to be noteworthy either, although I am happy to be corrected on this. (aeropagitica) 17:18, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep OK, I am open to correction and have changed my opinion as a result of the following comments. (aeropagitica) 21:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a link to a map and another detail. As far as I recall, the precedent is that any real geographic places are kept (from memory, American communities with populations of zero or one have been kept...). Anyway, Lodsworth's got a village hall, a pub and a church! Sliggy 18:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Sliggy.Obina 20:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Sliggy, have seen many articles about less populous villages around Wikipedia. Mallocks 20:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Undecided Like aeropagitica, I'm swayed by he discussion, but not entirely towards a "keep". As it stands, it's still functioning primarily as a plug for the pub, and I can't see any way out of that save adding more detail. But this is a more general issue, and I feel I'm too new to Wikipedia to cast a vote on how to handle such a situation, to which I'm sure there are precedents. BrownHairedGirl 22:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and expand. Real place with real communities of interest. Capitalistroadster 23:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep we've far smaller places here. I added another few relevant words to the article. Grutness...wha? 07:25, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.