Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lloyd Grant (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no clear consensus, defaulting to keep. Subject might meet WP:MUSIC - did he WRITE the solo and get credit for writing? Not clear. Safest thing is to keep.. Tan ǀ 39 20:11, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lloyd Grant[edit]

Non-notable. Fancruft relating to Metallica. Insufficient inline cites and reliability. Tenacious D Fan (talk) 17:06, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Tenacious D Fan (talk) 17:07, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject, being known for just one thing (and that one thing is making a demo recording - by definition non-notable), does not appear to cut WP:BIO. Nothing has changed since the last AfD, so redirect if needs be. Ohconfucius (talk) 06:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Evil Spartan (talk) 00:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Listed on a Metallica album material as a one-time member of the band. Meets WP:Music. Covered in a published book considered a highly reliablee source on the subject. A great small article. Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 03:43, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.