Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzie Clachan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:50, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzie Clachan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, fails WP:GNG, no in-depth coverage JMHamo (talk) 19:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 20:24, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable theatre designer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She has done the set design for several notable performances at notable theatres. Her work has received critical attention. Her art as a set designer is profiled at length in Exeunt Magazine. Passes CREATIVE. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to mention that I've cleaned up the article, added sources (some are behind paywall, but not all are) and started a list of her significant work as a set designer. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:38, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:07, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Megalibrarygirl, who has done an excellent job in demonstrating notability. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:09, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.