Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liza Hanim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Liza Hanim[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. (Article tagged for notability for over two years.) There is only one source, which barely mentions Liza Hanim. A PROD was contested in 2009, by an editor who said he would add sources, but never did. A Google search produces this Wikipedia article, YouTube, FaceBook, a site that lists lyrics, artist promotion sites, etc etc, but nothing that could be regarded as coverage in a reliable independent source. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:52, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Nothing on G that would be worth as reliable sources, article has languished for nearly 4 years relying on a single source that would be inadequate to pass WP:MUSIC. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 11:57, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This article is also on the Spanish and Malay Wikipedias. The Spanish one is very similar and has the same single source. The Malay one is bigger but has no sources. The Malay Wikipedia also has 9 articles covering some of her albums. These are also unsourced. Anyone know any Spanish or Malay? If, as seems likely, we decide to delete this article, it might be worth highlighting these articles to our sister projects. Yaris678 (talk) 12:22, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Spanish article is a straight translation of the English one. The text of the Malaysian article is actually shorter than the English one, and it only looks longer because more space is given to the discography, and there are things like a list of awards she entered for but didn't win. The article actually does less than the English one at suggesting that she is significant. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 13:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 13:21, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. 108.12.134.72 (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found this website, although it doesn't appear to be significant. Unfortunately, other than that, I couldn't find much else. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:31, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with no prejudice to recreate if someone finds enough reliable sources to support any assertion this singer meets WP:ENT. Mkdw ^talk 07:12, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.