Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz in September

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep and I should note Azuki mentioned his withdrawing at a message to me (NAC). SwisterTwister talk 22:35, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liz in September[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough sources. —azuki (talk · contribs · email) 07:10, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. A search brought up that the film has been reviewed in various RS, so it passes NFILM. There was also some foreign language coverage, which I've added as sources. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets, and actually exceeds, every criteria set forth in WP:N(films). Thanks. Picomtn (talk) 10:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.