Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liz Faublas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Liz Faublas[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have removed the A7 tag from this, because it makes a credible claim of significance. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:19, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There is also a Draft:Liz Faublas which is a copy of this. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:23, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Creating author User:Efaublas has been blocked for sockpuppetry. Not G5 because wasn't blocked at time of creation. Not in itself a reason to delete, but lack of notability is. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.