Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liyann Seet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:21, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Liyann Seet[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not passes WikiProject Beauty Pageants notability guidelines and GNG. Interviews and information are trivial based on after her first runner-up spot and Miss Asia Pacific Petite World title (sub title under the same non-notable pageant) Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:57, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. – robertsky (talk) 03:02, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable individual Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:23, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in addition to not passing Beauty Pageants notability guidelines as stated by nom, sections on being a young investor and fashion trendsetter are WP:PROMO in nature. Refs are mainly interviews. Information about her appearing in various publications as model or representing the various brands are not immediate verifiable in stated sources. – robertsky (talk) 07:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an overly promotional article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:58, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.