Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liverpool F.C. 1–2 Grimsby Town F.C. (2001)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:47, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool F.C. 1–2 Grimsby Town F.C. (2001)[edit]

Liverpool F.C. 1–2 Grimsby Town F.C. (2001) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. It's almost 20 years since the match was played and there's not much in the way of long-term notability about the match aside from one article in the Grimsby Telegraph. This isn't notable in the same way as other giant-killing articles we have here. Due to this, I believe the article should be deleted. NapHit (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 16:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - agree there is no lasting significant to, or coverage of, this match. GiantSnowman 17:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete
  • Delete - while the article is lengthy and well-referenced, an equivalent article could be produced for basically any professional football match in England, given the coverage they get. To get a stand-alone article requires a particular claim to notability above and beyond that, and I am not seeing that here -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per above. We're not in the business of producing match reports for football matches. Could only be justified if there was something truly extraordinary about this match Nigej (talk) 17:13, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 22:12, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 14:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per all. Fails GNG. RockOften (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete this doesn't pass WP:GNG, as it's not a massive "giant killing". It was a Tier 2 team beating a Tier 1 team, which is why there's not lasting coverage if this unlike some other FA Cup shocks. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Abstain A night that was probably more well sourced and covered at the time and was certainly considered a giant killing due to the size and financial difficulties of Grimsby Town. Having come across similar articles on Wikipedia featuring games of a similar stature I hoped this would at least be worthy of being notable enough to remain, certainly given the hours I put in to trying to unearth the references and beef up the article to being as informative as possible. Alas, although aware I am long past tired of trying to navigate some Wiki policies. I have never been a fan of removing informative articles but I don't make the rules, so with that I abstain because it would be pretty pointless to say otherwise. Footballgy (talk) 15:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak delete per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 15:37, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above, fails GNG Myconcern (talk) 18:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.