Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiveU

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 20:05, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LiveU[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable company. Does not describe what is notable about it. A web search does not show any sources to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:NCORP. -Lopifalko (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC) Lopifalko (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Lopifalko (talk) 21:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The claim to notability is that it ‘developed and patented the technology for cellular bonding for remote news gathering’. Not sure if that supports a stand alone article though. Mccapra (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe Keep. My university library gets over 700 article hits (including journal articles) on this topic. Whether, it's all promotional/tangential or if there is significant coverage would take a tremendous amount of time which I am not willing to invest. That said, my suspicion from the sheer amount of hits is that it is likely going to pass WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 16:39, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of this makes for a compelling argument founded in our guidelines/policies. If you do decide to "invest" some time, let us know what types of references you find. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:29, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 17:00, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - to be kept it would have to explain why "portable live video acquisition solutions" and "cellular bonding" are considered notable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 17:28, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate and references that meet the criteria for establishing notabilty, topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.