Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liu Xingtu
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was WP:WITHDRAWN . (non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 15:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Liu Xingtu[edit]
- Liu Xingtu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for 5 years; I couldn't establish notability Boleyn (talk) 19:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 19:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If the claim to membership in the Chinese Academy of Engineering can be verified, this is a clear keep. I've not been able to do so - travelling right now, and somehow the web connections to the site are not going through. There is also the problem that the English version of the site is really primitive, so some knowledge of Chinese will be necessary. RayTalk 22:09, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Try 刘兴土 and 中国工程院 (Liu Xingtu and Chinese Academy of Engineering). According to his article on Baidu [1] (in Chinese) he gained membership in 2007 so it just needs a more reliable source. This CCTV article [2] (in Chinese) mentions some related project but I haven't had time to read it. Feel free to have a go. Funny Pika! 05:57, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:55, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Taking FunnyPika's advice, I found an article [3] that does confirm his academy status, passing WP:PROF#C3, although he seems to have been embroiled in some kind of plagiarism scandal. RayTalk 08:54, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination Thanks for your hard work, Boleyn (talk) 12:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.