Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Liu Wai Hung
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn and Speedy Keep. As the nominator I am withdrawing and keeping this article. Editors are reminded of the policy at WP:V which puts the burden for sourcing and verification on those who add the material in the first place. JodyBtalk 09:20, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Liu Wai Hung[edit]
- Liu Wai Hung (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No sourcing or attribution here to substantiate notability. No way to verify the minimal claims that are made. This article is over a year old and nothing significant has been added since creation. JodyBtalk 03:19, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk) 03:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I added some references. Note that the article has an interwiki link to the Chinese Wikipedia, and the Chinese article at zh:廖偉雄 has a list of films he has appeared in. I fund some English-language references by searching the Google News archive at http://news.google.com/archivesearch I would encourage any editor who is considering nominating an article for deletion because it lacks references to first check the Google News archive. -- Eastmain (talk) 03:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Chinese lnaguage article appears substantial and is not recent.--ZayZayEM (talk) 05:38, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per refs added by Eastmain. Meets WP:N and WP:V.--Sting Buzz Me... 06:56, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - but can we get someone with native English and some Chinese skills to have a go at this? - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Enough sources have been added to prove his notability. --Neo-Jay (talk) 08:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.