Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Littlest Pet Shop: Unleashed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:00, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Littlest Pet Shop: Unleashed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:TVSERIES until debut. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 00:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - As an article for a forthcoming show, we need substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. We absolutely do not have that. None of the sources give the title and most do not mention a new show. 1) is a press release, not independent and does not mention a show. 2) is a tweet, apparently from a show runner (not independent) which mentions "a new TV Show on 2018". 3) is another non-independent press release which does not mention the show. 4) is a Youtube clip pushig new toys for 2017, with no mention of a new show. 5-14) are trademark applications, apparently filed by Hasbro for various character names -- a primary source which does not mention LPS, much less a new LPS show. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:51, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At this point I'm going with an elaborate hoax, judging from the 'Twitter source' being from Baja California...not exactly a hub of animation, and even beyond most standards seems like someone playing pretend (if they're a 'Hasbro insider', why are they mad at their own company about not releasing clips and posters?). We don't have a logo for the show itself, which is almost a sure sign of wool-pulling, and Hasbro probably trademarks names which will never see a store shelf. There's no proof of anything here (and considering they own part of their own network, that the original editor didn't think of that raises more alarm bells). Finally, going by the title, a girl-focused show (or a show in 2017 for that matter) isn't really going to use the word "Unleashed", which is a early 2010s artifact. Nate • (chatter) 05:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article tells us that this series will not have its debut until 2018, and as Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, it would be wise to wait until 2018 until it has an article about it. Currently, the article is very short. Vorbee (talk) 14:08, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails verifiability all the way around. — Wylie pedia 05:42, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.