Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Oral Annie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Little Oral Annie[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO (scene award doesn't count) and GNG Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:42, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:02, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:13, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - won of award, notable. Subtropical-man talk
(en-2) 13:05, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The award win was scene-related, which no longer counts for notability per WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per above - Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 15:23, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A porn Golden Oldie, but unfortunately does not meet the project's notability threshold. Scene awards are expressly barred in the wording of WP:PORNBIO. Tarc (talk) 19:18, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Poorly sourced porn biography. Fails PORNBIO with only a scene-related award win. Fails GNG lacking significant coverage by reliable sources. My searches got passing mentions in article mostly about the films she appeared in. Golden Age star but still not notable. • Gene93k (talk) 19:31, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notable porn stars from this period typically show a substantial level of durable coverage; for this performer, it's bare;y marginal. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 01:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Award does not meet notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:01, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.