Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Girl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as vandalism or nonsense. --Nlu (talk) 07:05, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Little Girl[edit]

I originally saw this with a Wiktionary template, but I changed the template because I don't think having this in Wiktionary is even consistent with normal dictionaries because dictionaries usually have entries for 2-word phrases only if the phrase cannot be defined by combining the definitions of the individual words. Delete if it cannot be expanded into an encyclopedia article. Georgia guy 22:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as absolutely pointless dicdef. Do we also need an entry for "Green Tree" defined as a tree that is green? Fan1967 22:59, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- No, Green Tree is simply a re-direct to Green Tree, Pennsylvania. Georgia guy 23:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Girl. --F a ng Aili 23:03, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Fang Aili. Edgar181 00:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete completely useless entry. -- Y Ynhockey ^(Talk) Y 07:00, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Can't imagine the redirect being useful. Petros471 16:51, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as definitely irrelevant dicdef. --Ezeu 20:22, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as needless entry. 64.192.107.242 00:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think that this term it used as commen as child, girl, boy and it is used a lot in the movies and in every day English. If this term is inappropriate than the term children is also inappropriate. So we should keep it. --Belginusanl 01:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. The phrase "little girl" can be slightly idiomatic, in that it doesn't always reflect the precise expected meaning. Actually, "young girl" is more idiomatic in this respect, generally referring to a teen rather (than as might be expected) a female in early childhood. "Little child" is used in this manner in the title of a Beatles song. The Union Gap's ~~"Go Away Little Girl"~~ "Young Girl" is certainly not about about a young child, and a non-native-speaker could be perplexed by this if he merely referenced the words "little" and "girl" and tried to combine them. A decent (very short) article could be written on this, but probably not under this title, and anyway this article isn't it. Herostratus 13:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to girl. If the decision is to keep, rename little girl. — Insta ntnood 20:38, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This entry, and only this entry, was vandalized off the AfD March 9 log. --Rory0 96 02:29, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.