Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Fyodor (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:26, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Little Fyodor[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

notability and coverage? reviews in article have 3 out of 4 being the same source, not much more found. Alan - talk 00:18, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This bio is not well assembled and could be easily improved upon. References include Rocky Mountain News (daily newspaper, now defunct) and Westword (major arts weekly newspaper). Madamecp (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:14, 27 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Teach me to sign notes in my sleep! Here's 6125 search results for Little Fyodor at Westword alone. Maybe some nice Wikipedia editors want to peruse it? http://www.westword.com/search/index?collection=blogs&keywords=Little%20Fyodor Madamecp (talk) 22:37, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added discography to show recorded output over past 25 years. More reviews and such to come. Byoung67 (talk) 17:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Weakly, but still. There's a lot of Google News hits to be found. Seems a sour-grape nomination. Drmies (talk) 04:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per discography. google hits.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:43, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - subject is not weak, article is unfinished, that's the problem. Sorellasotero (talk) 01:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I just did a lot of format work. Moved things around, referenced the Dr. Demento appearances. The bio could use a rewrite (and doesn't need the subject's name in every sentence), but my brain's not up for the challenge today. Madamecp (talk) 15:06, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.