Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LiteDiary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LiteDiary[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CMS that doesn't meet WP:NSOFT or WP:GNG. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 19:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking independent RS references. A search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 14:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my first searches found nothing convincingly good. SwisterTwister talk 06:19, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage. The essay at WP:Notability (software) can be informative, although it is not a guideline. Fails WP:GNG. --Bejnar (talk) 17:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.