Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video games with plot twists
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 00:52, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
List of video games with plot twists[edit]
Let's Delete this one for the same reasons found at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of films with plot twists: hopelessly POV, unwieldy list that can easily be categorized, the plot twist can be better noted in each article, has about as much utility as a list of video games with male protagonists, etc. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Maybe we can merge it with "List of Deleted articles about 'List of (x) with plot twists'".--み使い Mitsukai 04:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Wouldn't this be every video game ever created? FCYTravis 04:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per FCY. Royboycrashfan 04:20, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless somebody explains why this discussion should be in the List of plot twists in AfD discussions on lists with plot twists. Kusma (討論) 04:33, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with plot twist --Alan Au 05:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. *drew 05:42, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as this describes pretty much every game. Cyde Weys 05:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- delete nonsense. This is getting ridiculous. -ZeroTalk 07:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. At this state, this list is useless as it doesn't explain what counts as a plot twist. I could add PONG in there, with as much explanation of its plot twists as any of the other games have. JIP | Talk 07:28, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, bad list. —Quarl (talk) 2006-02-03 13:07Z
- Delete, this list can never be maintained. A bad one indeed. --Terence Ong (恭喜发财) 13:52, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete with fear that a bizarre plot twist will somehow save it from its fate.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sethimothy (talk • contribs) 08:02, 3 February 2006 (UTC)
Keep this article...and the plot twist is that I actually mean Delete listcruft, mwa ha ha!--Isotope23 21:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Delete Yeah, what a great idea - let's pick a topic for a list so we can list every. Single. Game. Since. 1990. And start building it from some new-school whatever-duhs. Well, the thing is, great lists aren't made like this! --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 01:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per wwwwolf. It's as redundant as List of 24 episodes with Jack Bauer. --Kinu 04:42, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Pointless and unmanagable. Ben W Bell 20:48, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unencyclopedic and irreconcilably POV. It could also be considered to be a list that is unmaintainable or of interest to very few people, i.e. listcruft. Stifle 01:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, a useless and unmaintainable list. Might as well have a List of videogames! Grandmasterka 07:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.