Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video games rated E

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 12:19, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of video games rated E[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reasons as here: unmaintainable, useless, Wikipedia not a directory, etc. Seregain (talk) 16:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A category would hold the same information and have the advantage of being auto-updated. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:04, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Lists and categories are not considered overlapping in purpose or function. A list compliments a category and vice versa. æron phone home 18:19, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Gongshow ^Talk 16:51, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 16:52, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. totally incomplete, totally unneeded, very hard to maintain. GBK2010 (talk) 17:06, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. A category is a good idea, though. Glenfarclas (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my comment with the other List of video games rated XYZ. JBsupreme (talk) 18:18, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above; not a directory, indeed. Jack Merridew 18:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as with AfD:Games rated M and AfD:games rated T -Thibbs (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of video games rated T. --Teancum (talk) 15:06, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.