Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of trivia on That '70s Show

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge/redirect. Consensus seems to be to not have this article as a standalone, but to merge it to the main article. I am doing a simple redirect so people can merge the information they want. W.marsh 16:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of trivia on That '70s Show[edit]

Fancruft at best. That 70's Show was a hit show, but it certainly doesn't need a trivia page. Find a site with all the trivia, and put a link to it on the main That 70's Show page, and that's good enough RobJ1981 21:48, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. TJ Spyke 23:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Leo's real first name is Leonard. REALLY!?!?!? Croat Canuck Go Jays Go 00:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. I like the malformed name which technically describes a list of instances of trivia being presented as trivia on the show.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the main '70s show article. P eople Powered 13:08, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, but only the main points. One-time visitors to the show's main page tend to add redundant and/or pointless info, so that needs may need to be trimmed from time to time when the section becomes too big. - Zone46 02:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment material should only be merged if it belongs in the body of the article as prose. Trivia sections should be removed from articles, not added.--Fuhghettaboutit 02:27, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's your personal opinion not policy. PMA 14:35, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both of those statements are true but deceptive. It is not policy and it is my opinion, but it is also established guideline per Wikipedia:Avoid trivia sections in articles. As such, it is actionable and supported by consensus.--Fuhghettaboutit 17:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Q0 10:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Trivia is not good prose and does not help Wikipedia to have a dumping ground for lazy users. Interrobamf 05:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Bill.matthews 02:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.