Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Amsterdam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of tourist attractions in Amsterdam[edit]

This belongs at Wikitravel. Cordless Larry 12:14, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If this artikel is to be deleted then artikels like:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paris_landmarks http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_museums_in_Paris http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_museums_and_galleries_in_Berlin http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Visitor_attractions_in_Dublin etc etc etc should also be deleted —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.192.116.7 (talk) .

The Dublin one is a category, not an article, which I think is more suitable. I've also nominated Visitor information for Dublin, Ireland for deletion. That said, I'll admit that I think the Amsterdam one is a marginal case. Cordless Larry 13:01, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe we should make the List of tourist attractions in Amsterdam also a catagory? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.192.116.7 (talk) .

I think that's probably the best solution. It would be good to get other people's opinions. Cordless Larry 13:12, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just contributed quite a lot to this page and would find it quite demoralizing to see this page be deleted. As 62.192.116.7 said, a lot of the big city's have such a section, sometime's as a page of its one sometime's in the main page of the city. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iijjccoo (talk • contribs) .

Keep a list of notable places with wikipedia articles is okay. Arbusto 14:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, useful, encyclopedic information and plenty of community acceptance of this type of list on Wikipedia...though I'd rather see it renamed to "List of landmarks in Amsterdam." Postdlf 14:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, encyclopedic list, not listcruft. --Ter e nce Ong _{(T | C)} 07:35, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.