Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Durham, North Carolina

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:52, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Durham, North Carolina[edit]

List of tallest buildings in Durham, North Carolina (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is only one building over 100 meters. Also, the article does not seem to meet WP:NLIST/WP:GNG. Also, there is a new rule in Durham that limits buildings to 300 feet or 27 stories, so it is unlikely that more building above 100 meters will be built.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by City Dweller 2 (talkcontribs) 22:02, December 9, 2022 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ "Durham to see several 27-story skyscrapers: 300 ft. height limit explains the size | North Carolina Construction News". www.ncconstructionnews.com. Retrieved 2022-11-13.
  • Comment Completing nomination on behalf of the tagger--above text is copied from the article talk page. I have no opinion of my own at this time. @City Dweller 2: For future nominations, please fully follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO. Thank you. --Finngall talk 06:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am currently leaning Weak Keep because I believe that the list scrapes by WP:NLIST and WP:GNG, although some more coverage would be welcomed. More advice for nom (pinging nom @City Dweller 2:) in future; make it a bit clear where and how the article violates the policies you have broken, because it is not very clear in your submission. Also, the contents of the list (the height of the buildings or new city rules) are not considered in AfD unless they directly affect policy, which they don't. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 09:32, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete Yet another list copied from Emporis, where the fact that a church tower is #6 on the list is a bad sign. These buildings just aren't that tall. Mangoe (talk) 14:08, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 06:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.