Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of spells and potions in Sabrina, the Teenage Witch (TV series)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 14:15, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of spells and potions in Sabrina, the Teenage Witch (TV series)[edit]

Original Research, fancruft, not notable outside the TV show. Pharmboy (talk) 14:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

should also include List of spells and potions in Sabrina, the Teenage Witch (TV Series) which is a redirect. Pharmboy (talk) 14:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The only reason I created the page was because the information was strangely located on the List of Episodes page.. I guess it should be deleted if it counts as Fancruft, but I didn't want to just delete something that somebody had obviously spent time writing. :) - ǀ Mikay ǀ 14:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would probably be better as part of a main article, and trimmed down to be more concise. I'm not saying there is no room for the information, but a seperate article is likely not the place for it. Pharmboy (talk) 15:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trim and Merge - Not every detail of what happened needs to be included, but 2-3 short sentences for each on the main article might be OK. LonelyBeacon (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- See Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. StudierMalMarburg (talk) 18:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per StudierMalMarburg. Lists where most/all of the items don't (and aren't likely to) have their own articles are unnecessary. Cosmo0 (talk) 22:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as an indiscriminate collection of info and total cruft. Merge any sourcable, relevant content if necessary.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 02:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.