Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs whose title mentions genres other than the genre of the song itself

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:47, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs whose title mentions genres other than the genre of the song itself[edit]

Is there ANY possible use for this page? Seems like listcruft to me, right up there with List of songs recorded by a female artist who prefers flats to heels and List of music videos that were not recorded in Davenport but in an area that looks strikingly similar. Delete. --InShaneee 20:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. PJM 20:19, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Roffle. Delete per nom. --Aurochs
Delete -- but if anyone does create that Davenport list, I'm voting to keep it! --Christofurio 20:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Utterly pointless listcruft. Punkmorten 21:51, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Edwardian 22:12, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Why do I get the feeling someone is playing aroun with WP:POINT in creating all these lists? 23skidoo 23:47, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think so. User:SuperDude115 has a history of listcruft. See List of songs whose genre occurs in the title and List of automobile model nameplates with a discontiguous timeline for some of the surviving ones. --InShaneee 00:27, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as obtuse as any list I have ever seen it. 02:26, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete - yet another of the sdude's useless creations. older≠wiser 03:01, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete utterly pointless! UkPaolo 14:22, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't believe he put a list up of THREE SONGS! Grande 14:55, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as brainfryingly pointless, and possibly disingenuous, listcruft. MCB 22:13, 18 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep haha just kidding, Delete is my real vote. AngryParsley ^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:15, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.