Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about body parts 2

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 00:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs about body parts[edit]

nn listcruft. I can't see any situation where it'd be very useful and it's unwieldy too. –127.0.0.1 (talk) 08:59, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was listed before on Apr 26, 2005, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about body parts, results was no consensus. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. -- Jared Hunt July 30, 2006, 10:19 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ViridaeTalk 10:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Body parts, while often hilarious, don't really require this kind of coverage. RandyWang (raves/review me!) 11:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. "Baby got back"? Please... -- Dyslexic agnostic 13:15, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. I'd hesitate to consider this encyclopedic, though I'd like to thank the editors involved for the time they put into the article. Luna Santin 13:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I'm not sure how I feel about the subject matter being encyclopedic or not. It certainly would help a person doing research on, say, sexuality in popular music. But I don't really feel strongly about it either way. The one thing I do think though -- those song quotes in the page have got to go! Jacqui★ 14:38, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment - Short, attributed quotes are acceptable; you must identify the writer. As I understand it, what brings one into copyright violation space is quoting a significant percentage of the song. Or is it the "boarderline obscenity" of a couple of them that you're concerned about? Williamborg (Bill) 15:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Sorry if I didn't make myself clear: I'm not concerned about copyright, and Wikipedia is not censored for minors. But the quotes don't explain anything and sound merely frivolous; the tone isn't right for an encyclopedia. Jacqui★ 02:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Since the heart is a body part, this list could include thousands of songs. NawlinWiki 14:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, NawlinWiki pretty much sums it up. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 15:49, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've Got Tears In My Ears (From Lyin' On My Back In My Bed While I Cry Over You) and agree we should Delete as unmaintainable listcruft. Fan-1967 16:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom.Allisonmontgomery69 23:41, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete That's just weird. per nom. -Royalguard11Talk 01:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 10:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Despite the fact that I frequently search encyclopedias for lists of songs about body parts, I must reluctantly agree with the consensus to Delete. VoiceOfReason 21:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. AgentPeppermint 03:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_songs_about_body_parts_2&oldid=1138023624"