Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postcodes in Victoria

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. WP:CSD#G4. postdlf (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of postcodes in Victoria[edit]

List of postcodes in Victoria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Topic was deleted previously during more than one AfD discussion under the title List of postcodes in Victoria (Australia), this one has been created without the (Australia) part. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postcodes in the Australian Capital Territory (3rd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of postcodes in the Australian Capital Territory Ajf773 (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 18:56, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - per nom and per previous AfDs (WP:NOTDIR) Spiderone 22:19, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom, WP:NOTDIR, and my reasoning at the last AfD. This article would seem to qualify for deletion under WP:CSD#G4, so I've tagged it appropriately. --AussieLegend () 06:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.