Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of planets in The Saga of Seven Suns

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Based on comments in the discussion, I will not delete any of the redirects pointing to this page; any interested editor(s) can repoint them to an appropriate new target. RL0919 (talk) 15:49, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of planets in The Saga of Seven Suns[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another fancruft list of something planets. While one source is a review, we need a second review to satisfy GNG, not the book. ミラ P 14:30, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 14:30, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 14:30, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:55, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A review of a single book in the series is absolutely worthless in support of an in-universe list. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to The Saga of Seven Suns. There appear to be reviews for all the books in the series there, but mentions of these many planets are minimal so adding the citations here will still not establish notability.— TAnthony^Talk 19:53, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable, in-universe plot information that belongs elsewhere. TTN (talk) 17:18, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the above. I do not think a redirect would be helpful as I cannot imagine that someone would type this out as a search term. Aoba47 (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My main concern is that there are numerous redirects to this list, which would be corrected by bot if this list is redirected (to avoid double redirects). Of course, if deletion is really preferred I suppose I can use AWB to fix all the redirects manually.— TAnthony^Talk 17:47, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. Non-notable and entirely fancruft..._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 08:04, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.