Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of philatelic material depicting an aspect of Pakistan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:51, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of philatelic material depicting an aspect of Pakistan[edit]

List of philatelic material depicting an aspect of Pakistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: This list only looks like a random collection of country links that fail notability WP:LISTN and WP:LISTVERIFY. No significant coverage in published reliable sources are found. Only one of the numerous entires has a source to verify its existence. ww2censor (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. ww2censor (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ww2censor (talk) 20:59, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Return to creator, notability unknown. No discussion, not in any tome. (Apologies to Elvis.) Fails LISTN per nom and being too broad and ill-defined a criterion. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:34, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No need to explain such an obviously failure of WP:LISTN. Ajf773 (talk) 08:42, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Unnecessary, and I severely doubt pages like this exist for any other country. And if they do, delete those too. AdoTang (talk) 22:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Doesn't meet notability criteria. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 13:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A massive list sourced to a blog? Of stamps or stamp-like things that have something vaguely to do with Pakistan?? The content isn't even comprehensible enough to fit into Postage stamps and postal history of Pakistan. Estheim (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, per nom. As it fails WP:GNG. Iflaq (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --Devokewater 14:50, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No obvious notability as a topic, fantastic title though. Hemiauchenia (talk) 20:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.