Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of pheonix clubs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of pheonix clubs[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A list of complete and utter original research. I've never heard of a "phoenix club" and the definition that the creator has dreamt up seems to make no sense (I fail to see how a team created in protest can be a "phoenix club") -- Big Dom 18:59, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep Well, Ok maybe pheonix club is a bit of an obscure name for the page, perhaps a rename and/or split would be better than deletion as I thinks it fits Ok under the List category it was intended for like List of stadium stands by capacity or List of rugby union stadiums by capacity. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 19:19, 14 February 2010 (UTC) :I think it would be best if this was just split into List of revival clubs and List of protest clubs as it's not a complete rubbish page, it's really under the wrong title and contains 2 conflicting elements The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 08:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete OK, I've split the page up into more appropriate names so theres no need for this one anymore. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 08:30, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to confirm exactly what the above means, the editor has now created List of protest clubs and List of revival clubs and copied the info to those articles...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:34, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Seeing as though you've !voted delete on your own article, you may as well tag it with {{db-g7}} and end this whole thing now. -- Big Dom 08:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, done that. The C of E. God Save The Queen! (talk) 10:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is an unsourced pile of original research for a term that's never been used to describe any of those teams. It's also unclear what is meant by the term: this was were a protest team, this was the result of a move, and this was the result of a team who moved and all three are listed. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 22:53, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - the most glaring thing to point out is that the title is spelt wrong..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:42, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - it is totally POV to say (for example) that the Wellington Phoenix arose from the failure of the New Zealand Knights (AND the Queensland Fury?). dramatic (talk) 06:09, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems to be a made up term and concept with no notability. Nick-D (talk) 07:28, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.